Meça você mesmo
Hourglass, pear, apple, rectangle or inverted triangle from bust/waist/hip.
Three shapes, one underlying idea
Of the five commonly used body-shape categories (hourglass, pear, apple, rectangle, inverted triangle), hourglass, pear, and apple get the most attention online — probably because they're the three where the bust-waist-hip relationship is most visually distinct. All three are defined the same underlying way our body shape analyzer works it out: by comparing bust, waist, and hip circumference.
Hourglass: balanced bust and hip, narrow waist
An hourglass shape has bust and hip measurements that are close in size to each other, with a waist that's meaningfully narrower than both. The defining feature isn't "big bust, big hips" — it's the contrast between the waist and the other two measurements. Someone can have a modest bust and hip size and still be a clear hourglass if the waist narrows proportionally.
Common misconception: that hourglass requires a specific bust or hip size. It doesn't — it's about the ratio, not the absolute numbers.
Pear: hips wider than bust
A pear (sometimes called "triangle") shape has hips that are noticeably wider than the bust, with a defined waist in between. Weight and width in this shape tend to sit more in the hips, thighs, and lower body than the upper body.
Common misconception: that pear shape means being overweight. Pear is a proportion, not a size — someone at any weight can have hips proportionally wider than their bust.
Apple: fuller midsection, less waist definition
An apple (or "round") shape has a midsection that's the widest part of the torso, with bust and hip measurements relatively close to each other but without the sharp waist narrowing seen in an hourglass. Weight in this shape tends to concentrate around the abdomen.
Common misconception: that apple shape is inherently unhealthy. Body shape classifiers like this one describe silhouette and fit, not health status — waist circumference is sometimes referenced in health contexts for other reasons, but a styling-oriented "apple" classification is not a medical assessment and shouldn't be treated as one.
Where rectangle and inverted triangle fit in
For completeness: a rectangle shape has bust, waist, and hip measurements that are all relatively similar, without a strong waist narrowing — closer to hourglass than apple, just without the pronounced hourglass contrast. An inverted triangle has a bust/shoulder line broader than the hips, tapering downward — the mirror image of pear. See our complete body-shape guide for all five side by side.
Why the labels get overused online
These terms circulate constantly in fashion and social-media content, often applied loosely to celebrities or used as a vague compliment/insult, detached from their actual measurement basis. The genuinely useful version of these labels is narrow and practical: they help predict which cuts of clothing will fit well, given the bust-waist-hip ratio you actually have — nothing more.
Why the same body can read differently in different clothes
Part of why these categories matter practically is that clothing cut interacts directly with the ratio. A pear shape in a garment cut for a rectangle (uniform width top to bottom) will look different than the same body in a garment cut to acknowledge a wider hip — not because the body changed, but because the cut either works with or against the underlying proportion. This is the whole practical reason these categories exist in styling contexts: not to rank bodies, but to predict which cuts are more likely to fit and flatter without alteration.
These categories aren't a strict science
It's worth repeating: unlike, say, a body-fat percentage measurement, body-shape categories don't have a single universally agreed technical definition or cutoff — different sources draw the boundaries between hourglass/rectangle or pear/hourglass slightly differently. Treat the category as a useful approximation for styling purposes, not a precise scientific classification with hard boundaries.
Find your actual shape
Guessing from a mirror is unreliable — most people misjudge their own proportions. The fastest accurate way is to measure bust, waist, and hip circumference and run the ratio through our body shape analyzer, which classifies you instantly instead of you cross-referencing a chart.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is hourglass the "ideal" body shape?
No — that's a cultural preference, not a factual ranking. All five shapes are simply descriptive categories; none is inherently better, and clothing exists to flatter every proportion.
Can I be a mix of two shapes?
Real measurements often fall close to a boundary between categories rather than cleanly into one. Classifiers pick the closest match, but it's normal to be a borderline case — the ratio is a spectrum, not five sharply separated boxes.
Does apple shape mean I'm unhealthy?
No. This classification describes proportion for styling purposes, not a health diagnosis. If you have health-related concerns about your weight or body composition, talk to a doctor rather than relying on a styling category.
How is this different from a BMI or body-fat calculation?
Completely different metric. Body shape is about the ratio between bust, waist, and hip — it says nothing about total body fat or weight. Our body fat calculator measures a different thing entirely; see our guide on body fat percentage ranges if that's what you're after.